Eastern European founders vs American founders

Who won? Who lost? YOU DECIDE!

Luca Stirbat
Luca Stirbat
September 9, 2025
8 min read

A quick word from the author:

Buna copii,

I’m baaack. I know, last week you didn’t receive the wonderful gift that is my writing, but here I am to grace you with my thoughts yet again.

Today, a bit of popcorn culture + metaphoric stereotyping. Just the way I like it 🙂

I’ve realized I haven’t told you a lot about my American Experience (moved to SF 5 months ago). Let’s start doing that with today’s topic:

Eastern European founders vs American founders (through the lens of Wednesday, my new show obsession)

If you’re not familiar, here’s the fastest rundown possible:

On the left, Enid, a werewolf that likes pink and is generally positive and upbeat and loves hanging out with people.

On the right, Wednesday, a loner, serial-killer obsessed with death, really talented and poetic.

It’s very similar to how founders operate in these 2 regions of the world: on one hand you have the Americans, being ultra mega positive and hyping themselves up to the moon, with an incredible network of connections that just make it possible (their pack).

On the other hand, you’ve got the Eastern European: one guy in a basement somewhere in Bulgaria that build that one piece of open-source software 80% of the internet relies on (I’m looking at you ffmpeg).

These two, polar opposites. Couldn’t be more different. Put them in the same room together, and there’s a 1125% chance sparks will fly.

And here’s where my obsession with the show Wednesday is even more apparent: in season 2, an entire Freak Friday episode happens (typical for these kind of coming-of-age shows). Masterfully executed might I add, the actresses freaking killed it.

Basically, you had the Eastern European founder trying to cosplay the American one and viceversa.

My favorite part of that episode is when Enid (in Wednesday’s body) gets a typical American rainbow milkshake that triggers Wednesday’s ALLERGY TO COLOR (if lack of color isn’t typical Eastern European, idk what is).

There’s a lot of twist and turns in the episode itself (not gonna spoil more here), but at the end, they both learn how it feels to be in each other’s shoes and what each other’s superpowers actually are.

So here’s my thoughts: I think we need each other. Eastern European founders need more positivity and generally a more positive outlook on their life and work. American founders need more grounding to stop overselling and under-delivering. The ideal team setup in my mind is an Eastern European CTO with an American CEO, the roles just fit.

TL;DR: Just go watch the show, it’s pretty freaking cool.

This week’s news slop:

Graphics programming is uniquely challenging in the beginning, because of how many rules and limitations the hardware, graphics APIs and the rendering pipeline impose. But it also unlocks incredible potential, as other limitations dissolve. Let’s find out how graphics programmers have leveraged that potential.

INCREDIBLE READ FOR NERDS, IGNORE IF YOU’RE NOT A NERD.

The big idea: Claude can automate the coding, while you step into higher-value roles as project manager, designer, and software architect. The trick is to stop treating Claude as a chatbox and start treating it as a framework—a set of rules, roles, and workflows that make its output predictable and valuable.

Even more fascinating – claude code doesn’t require code to become a framework – just structured prompts. And right now, the developer community is experimenting wildly—what you could call the Claude Code Framework Wars. Dozens of open-source projects are testing different recipes for how to work with AI productively.

The best prompts now are quite simple, leaving AI to handle how to answer a question. Meanwhile AI chat suffers from the same problem from command lines to Alexa – how can i remember what to ask? Only this time the problem is exacerbated by the fact that AI is capable of practically anything making the task less one of remembering commands but a creative one of coming up with great questions or delivering an interface to discover them and then wrapping the resulting prompts as buttons.

If you want to build a big software business, there are two ways to do it:

  1. Build a new product, and charge people to use it.

  1. Build a new product. But start small, in a narrow niche. Make some helpful utility, for a very specific set of people with a very specific problem. Downplay your ambitions; talk about how you’re solving a problem for yourself; how you’re building the thing you always wanted. Acknowledge your product’s rough edges; its odd opinions. Put it on Github; say it’s free, open source, forever. Go viral on Hacker News; talk to people on Twitter, on Reddit, never on LinkedIn. Create an online space for your users; call it your community. Open issues; debate them; ask for contributions. Build in public—for the people; of the people; by the people.

f you want to win, go faster. If in doubt and uncertain, go faster. If you want to make $1B dollars, go faster. If you want to change the world, go faster.


Startup Idea of the Week: ⛈️ Weather-based Calendar

(don’t build this in California)

You know what’s worse than canceling plans last minute?

Letting the weather cancel them for you.

That time you set up a picnic, only for the clouds to open up? Painful.

When you finally psych yourself up for a big work sprint—only to realize it’s the sunniest day of the month? Brutal.

And don’t even get us started on scheduling a long run the day it snows.

It’s not that we can’t plan. It’s that we don’t plan with the weather in mind.

Because who knows more about your week than your calendar? And who knows more about your mood than the forecast?

But right now, the two don’t talk to each other.

What if they did?

What if your calendar flexed around the sun, clouds, and rain?

How It Works

📲 Connect & Sync: Link Google or Outlook calendars, give weather access, set your city and preferences.

☀️ Play on Sun, Grind on Gray: The app rearranges your flexible tasks—moving deep work to rainy days, freeing up sunny slots for fun.

🧠 AI-First Planning: Non-negotiables stay fixed. Everything else shifts intelligently based on the 7-day forecast and your productivity style.

🔔 Always Adaptive: Forecasts change. So does your calendar. Real-time nudges help you adjust without the chaos.

Why This Works

Weather already dictates how we feel and what we do—whether we admit it or not.

Right now, planning ignores that reality. But Cloudcal flips it:

Sun comes out → You get more leisure time → Work still gets done on cloudy days → Your week feels balanced.

It’s productivity disguised as play.

Go-to-Market Plan

🎯 Start with remote workers, freelancers, and digital nomads who crave flexibility.

🤝 Partner with wellness coaches, co-working apps, and productivity influencers.

📦 Launch as a freemium SaaS (Cloudcal.ai) with an optional “Pro” tier.

🌍 Expand into team calendars and integrations (Slack, Notion, Jira) so companies can coordinate around weather-sensitive workflows.

Business Model

Freemium SaaS.

💻 Free: Single-user app with core weather-aware scheduling.
🚀 Pro: $10–15/month for smart integrations (Slack, Notion, multi-location weather), team use, and advanced customization.

Long-term play: Position for acquisition by a productivity platform like Notion, Atlassian, or Google Calendar—valued at a 5–7× multiple for its unique behavioral data and IP.


Ok, hear me out, you should try: Launch absurd mini-products to make your brand cool

To make your brand stand out and feel cool, launch an unrelated product in a category far and different from your core one (e.g. cookies from a marketing agency specialized in promoting books) and pick one main brand feature to use in the extension (e.g. make the cookies in the shape of books).

Launching an unrelated product in a totally different category (e.g. clothing from a snacks brand) makes people perceive the brand as cooler.

  • Across 4 experiments with 1,454 people and an analysis of over 5,000 social media comments, researchers found that:

    • When real brands launched extremely unrelated products (e.g. KFC’s fried chicken-scented nail polish, White Rabbit’s candy-scented body lotion, KFC Crocs), people felt surprise, joy and saw the brand as cooler

    • When a hot pot brand launched a spicy flavored toothpaste, people rated the brand as 20% cooler

    • When a snack brand launched an unrelated product of home furniture that had the shape of their signature cookie (vs one with no visual connection), people rated it as 11.5% cooler

  • The effect is:

    • Stronger when the brand is popular or well-known. When people saw herbal coffee marketed by a popular brand (vs a lesser known brand), they rated the brand as cooler

    • Stronger when the extension is co-branded. For example, people rated McDonald’s 9.7% cooler when they launched a sauce-themed sneaker with Adidas

    • Weaker when the new product is in a category near the core brand’s one (e.g. Instant noodle extension for a hot pot brand)

What’s going on for us (thanks for asking):

  • Level-1.dev: We have our first paid user. Pushing new features every single day.

  • European Startup Embassy: We officially have a house for Eastern European founders here in San Francisco. Full announcement at How To Web.

  • ReaktorX: We’re raising a $4M fund to invest in high-schoolers and students across CEE, fly them to SF and let them devour all of the script kiddies playing around with AI here.

One last meme for good measure.

Lots of hugs and some occasional punches from the author,

Thanks for reading Founder’s Compass! Subscribe for free to receive new posts.

Luca Stirbat
Written by
Luca Stirbat
ReaktorX Team
Applications open

Building something worth funding?
Apply to the programme.

Apply Now